VIRTUAL DAN

VIRTUAL DAN

Notes from my travels around the internet

VIRTUAL DAN
  • My Pacific Northwest Solar
  • About
Monthly Archives: January 2013

2012 Investment Contest Recap

The second annual investment contest wrapped up on December 31st with a record 16 participants.  For the second straight year, more portfolios underperformed the S&P 500 than outperformed, showing how difficult it is to outperform the index.

Portfolio   2012 Return
Tony 32.32 %
Tom 26.74 %
Karen 21.59 %
Greg W 16.49 %
Doc 15.68 %
Sarah 15.54 %
Ron 13.94 %
S&P 500 13.47 %
KC 11.97 %
Lee 8.59 %
Noreen 6.92 %
Mike N 6.66 %
Susie 5.63 %
Mike H 2.43 %
Brady -2.51 %
Matt -4.44 %
Lynn -6.86 %

Tony won this years contest, thanks largely to his huge January 2011 gain with USG (+26%), and MGM International (+25%).   Tom also deserves special mention, finishing 2nd this year after a 3rd place finish last year.  Tom’s picks are likely the best over the two year period of the contest.

I caught up with Tony via email to get more insight into his strategy that led him to such a huge gain for the year.  “For the first few months I picked stocks from a variety of fields, banking, housing, hi-tech, gaming. I deleted them if they had a big run up and added them back in if they had fallen.  Mid year I grew tired of working at it, so I just picked 4-5 stocks from the top of my head and kept them. Last couple months of the year I had a lead so I added some mutual funds to keep a more stable portfolio that would not be affected too much by one stock.”

Tony appears to be a top down investor, identifying market sectors that he believes will outperform the market, then identifying appropriate stocks in the chosen sectors.    Interestingly, when evaluating stocks to buy, Tony also uses technical analysis to choose his stocks, looking at market performance instead of finanials to make trading decisions.  “(I buy a stock when) technically is it at a low point.  If I feel like paying attention the technical are more important than the fundamentals.  But you have to be ready to dump it after a run up.” .  So take heart those of you that don’t dig into company 10k’s and 8qs, not all successful investors follow historical financials closely.  But you do have to pay attention.

Tony’s favorite stock right now is USG.  “just because the housing market has been so beaten up so I think there is upside. But it has already had some bit run ups so I’m not sure how much more it has.”.  Tony keeps the number of stocks he watches limited, “I pretty much stick with stocks I have been watching, a very small selection.”.

Tony’s market prediction for 2013?  “Big ups and downs as we have a series of financial cliffs.”.   Hmm.. sounds like a tricky market for fundamental and technical investors alike.

Thanks to all who participated in 2012, and good luck to all in 2013.

January 27, 2013 Dan 4 Comments

Followup: The Case Against Aaron Schwartz

In my previous post I questioned why the secret service was involved in the Aaron Schwarz downloading case.  Looks like we have an answer on that.   Empty Wheel has a great timeline of events that led to the Secret Service searching Mr. Schwartz Apartment alledgely related to the MIT download arrest.

In summary, on 12/27/10 Aaron Schwarz filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for videos of Bradley Manning describing his harsh (and illegal) treatment while in prison.  On  January 6,  Schwartz was arrested on Jan 6, 2011 for unauthorized downloading from the MIT database.  On February 9th, 2011, the Wall St Journal reported that the governments case against Bradley Manning was falling apart. The same day, the government obtained warrants to search Schwartz’s house (purportedly related to the MIT case), and on Febrary 11th they search Schwartz’s house and office (though they did not search the hardware implicated in the MIT case).

So it all comes back to Wikileaks.  Not coincidentally, Wikileaks now divulges Aaron Schwartz was likely a source of information:

http://allthingsd.com/20130120/wikileaks-alleges-relationship-with-web-activist-aaron-swartz/

So, what I want to know is,  what information did Wikileaks get that has the government going to such great lengths to disregard the rule of law and civil liberties?  What secrets does the government not want us to know?   Thanks much to Empty Wheel for being one of the few organizations to follow this story.

 

 

January 23, 2013 Dan 1 Comment

The Case Against Aaron Schwartz

I would guess most people really didnt know who Aaron Schwartz was prior to his suicide a few days ago. I admit I hadn’t been following this story until a number of articles were brought to my attention regarding why the government was going after him so strongly (up to 35 years in jail and a 1 million dollar fine).

Mr. Schwartz was charged with downloading public documents from MIT presumably with the purpose of uploading the documents to free file sharing sites. He was not hacking anything – the method he used to walk the site and request pages programmatically is very simple – any first year programmer could write the script an an hour or two. Mr. Schwartz’s charging papers provide great insight to what he likely did:

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2012/09/swartzsuperseding.pdf

In summary, 5 different times he fired off an automated script to download these documents to his laptop. This action was repeatedly caught by the MIT IT department, who tried to block each attempt. Interestingly, one of the charges is he prevented legitimate researchers from being unable to access the documents. In reading this, it appears to me the IT departments sloppy attempt to thwart him from downloading the documents by blocking large blocks of IP Addresses was the culprit – not necessarily Mr. Schwartz’s script. It is not clear if Mr. Schwartz violated any terms of use on the site.So I found it odd – perhaps scary when I ran across this article on the US Department of Justice site:
http://www.justice.gov/usao/ma/news/2011/July/SwartzAaronPR.html

This paragraph jumped out at me:

The New England Electronic Crimes Task Force has taken an aggressive stance in the investigation of computer intrusions and other cybercrimes,” said Steven D. Ricciardi, Special Agent in Charge of the United States Secret Service in New England. “Through this task force, the Secret Service and our partners on the Cambridge and MIT Police Departments demonstrate the importance of cooperation among law enforcement to focus resources and respond effectively to investigate and prevent this type of fraud.”

One more great post here explaining why what Mr. Schwartz did was not a crime:

http://unhandled.com/2013/01/12/the-truth-about-aaron-swartzs-crime/

The term fraud and cybercrime is not applicable in this case. These were public documents open to any MIT student. There was no national security risk here – how and why did the US Secret Service involved?  This makes no sense at face value.  Anything to do with Aaron Schwartz being a free internet activist and leader in the fight against SOPA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz)?

While I do not necessarily condone Mr. Schwartz’s actions, this whole incident appears to me to be another tragic cost of the US Governments ‘War on Terror’, and how it is further eroding the rule of Law in the United States. I hope something good will come out of the tragic end to this story – but I am not optimistic.

Update:  I posted an update on explaining why the secret service is involved.

January 13, 2013 Dan 2 Comments

NATO vs Syria

An odd article here from CBS news – obviously fed directly to CBS from NATO. The headline “NATO Reports another Scud launch in Syria” would lead you to believe increased military activity is going on by the Syrian regime.  Unfortunately for NATO, this news feed from NATO got in the hands of a writer who softens it up with his own skeptism.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57563240/nato-reports-another-scud-launch-in-syria-but-what-are-the-scuds-hitting/

My favorite quotes are “There have been no reports from Syrian opposition groups or rebel militias on the ground of ballistic missiles landing in northern Syria.” and when referring to video of Scuds being launched – “While it is impossible to verify the authenticity, date or location of the videos, the accents of the apparent soldiers heard speaking during the launches are Syrian.“

NATO is quoted as saying “(NATO)  condemned the alleged use of the unguided weaponry, with an official telling the Reuters news agency it, “shows utter disregard for the lives of the Syrian people.” .  Perhaps this is meant to urge Iran to sell Syria captured American drones so that they can kill civilians more effectively like the United States Government.

Nice try NATO – but next time try a little harder to justify your case for invasion.

January 10, 2013 Dan Leave a comment

A Great Reason for Not Building Stadiums

I couldn’t pass this one up – one study shows that sports teams may actually drain resources from cities:

http://www.businessinsider.com/its-actually-good-for-a-citys-economy-when-their-sports-teams-go-on-strike-2013-1

If you live in a city where the argument for a publicly funded stadium is being pushed by the media, give this some thought.  Perhaps some thought should be given to not providing public funds, and perhaps taxing them because they siphon dollars away from local businesses.

January 3, 2013 Dan 1 Comment

Archives

  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • November 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (3)
  • December 2019 (2)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (2)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (2)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (4)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (4)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (4)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • January 2014 (5)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • November 2013 (6)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • August 2013 (4)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • May 2013 (5)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (6)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (5)
  • December 2012 (5)
  • November 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (3)
  • September 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (3)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (2)
  • January 2012 (1)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (2)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (3)
  • April 2011 (6)
  • March 2011 (8)
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER: The operator of this site (Vertical Financial Systems, Inc) are not registered investment advisers, broker/dealers, or research analysts/organizations. The content on this website is issued solely for information purposes and should not to be construed as an offer to buy, sell, or trade in any way, any security mentioned herein. All information presented on this website is believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. You are responsible for doing your own research before investing in any securities mentioned herein. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. Neither Vertical Financial Systems, Inc, nor its officers or employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of information on this website.
Full Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Powered by WordPress | theme SG Simple