VIRTUAL DAN

VIRTUAL DAN

Notes from my travels around the internet

VIRTUAL DAN
  • My Pacific Northwest Solar
  • About

If I were a kingmaker

  • Politics

So imaging what it would be like to be the head of the Republican party:  its a year and a half to the presidential election, and you have no feasible candidates for the big event.  

So as head of the Republican Party, what are my choices?   For this analysis, lets assume both Palin and Trump are not viable candidates – they are just entertainers.  And Mitt Romney is too flawed to run as a Republican in this political environment.  So here are my guesses as to the 3 most interesting strategies I would evaluate:

  • 1.  Mike Huckabee or Michelle Bachman or other nonelectable conservative – throw party money and support  at the campaign.  Not too much, because I know its a lost cause.  However,  I am building goodwill among my base and reaffirming the appearance of having conservative values.   This base building will keep my base loyal, and that will free me up to put up a less conservative candidate in the next election while still hopefully having an energized base.
  • 2.  Tim Pawlenty – Throw money at the Pawlenty campaign and hope that I can build a buzz and a following.  Seems like a longshot,  as there is nothing that really stands out about him – in the end he will likely flame out in a Dukakis like landslide.
  • 3.  Ron Paul – Maybe I can cut a deal with Ron Paul – promise to throw all my money into his organization, and bring him into the Republican fold.  The deal would have to be he agrees to soften his position on his most outspoken Libertarian ideas, amd move to the right a bit to pick up some of religious conservatives – though the religious conservatives would have no where to go.  The objective  would be to bring in some Tea Partiers, and possibly also attract the moderate Reagan democrats.  Also, get Paul to agree to my choice for Vice Presidential candidate.  Would need someone to do the dirty work in the organization – handle the money inflows and outflows.  Someone like Newt Gingrich or Haley Barbour to run the White House ala Dick Cheney.

Will be interesting to watch what happens – and what other options will unfold.  Any other strategies out there?  Feel free to comment.

May 11, 2011 Dan

Post navigation

Microsoft and Skype → ← Check this out if you want to feel insignificant

3 thoughts on “If I were a kingmaker”

  1. Tony Vetro says:
    May 13, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    Sorry Dan, but I am going to have to completely disagree with some basic assumptions. I don’t think the Republicans can afford to throw away this presidential election by going with Mike Huckabee, Michelle Bachman or especially Ron Paul. They have to be at least competative to keep the House and take over the Senate. They lost 3 Senate seats by running unelectable candidates and will not make that mistake in the presidential election. Assuming Jeb Bush really means it when he says he won’t run…Mitt Romney might not be able to win but with a tea partier on the ticket I think he can be competative. Right now it appears that Mitch Daniels is the best shot they have and it appears that he is going to be the choice. He already has the support of Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. If I were the leader of the Republicans that is where I would put all my money. And with the support of Barbour he won’t have to bribe the tea-partiers and he can afford to make a reasonable choice for VP or a strategic pick like Rubio of Florida. Anything can happen in the next 18 months. If the economy continues to stagnate they need a candidate who won’t turn off the majority of voters.

    Reply
    1. Dan says:
      May 15, 2011 at 8:36 am

      I guess I should amend my option #2 ‘Tim Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels or other unknown fiscal conservative’ – at any rate the strategy is the same – throw money at him, try to get a buzz going. If this is the approach they take, maybe the best strategy would probably be to do nothing til late this year or early next – several months before the primaries, then flood money into the campaign to build a buzz, and hope the buzz lasts til November. Seems a longshot – and in the end I think the center would stick with Obama over a manufactured candidate, and give Obama a landslide. Plus, Mitch Daniels doesn’t have presidential hair.

      Reply
  2. Tony Vetro says:
    May 15, 2011 at 9:56 am

    Ok, if you want to put Daniels in with your option #2 that is the option I think they will/should take. However I don’t think it will be necessarily be in vain. I think that the election really will be dependant on the economy. Regardless of the candidate the Republicans best option is continuing to hammer at ‘stop spendng money’, ‘the government is too big’. Very easy to understand for the average worker and the Democrats have shown that they are not able to articulate any benefits of spending public money for things like jobs and health care. That could be enough for a Republican candidate to pull a victory in 2012.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Archives

  • March 2021 (1)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • November 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (2)
  • January 2020 (3)
  • December 2019 (2)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • February 2019 (2)
  • January 2019 (3)
  • December 2018 (2)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (2)
  • September 2018 (2)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (2)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (2)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (3)
  • December 2017 (2)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (2)
  • June 2017 (3)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (3)
  • February 2017 (3)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • September 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (3)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (4)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (4)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (4)
  • June 2014 (4)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (2)
  • January 2014 (5)
  • December 2013 (4)
  • November 2013 (6)
  • October 2013 (3)
  • September 2013 (3)
  • August 2013 (4)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • May 2013 (5)
  • April 2013 (2)
  • March 2013 (6)
  • February 2013 (6)
  • January 2013 (5)
  • December 2012 (5)
  • November 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (3)
  • September 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (3)
  • July 2012 (3)
  • June 2012 (2)
  • May 2012 (3)
  • March 2012 (3)
  • February 2012 (2)
  • January 2012 (1)
  • December 2011 (3)
  • November 2011 (3)
  • October 2011 (2)
  • September 2011 (2)
  • August 2011 (3)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • June 2011 (4)
  • May 2011 (3)
  • April 2011 (6)
  • March 2011 (8)
WEBSITE DISCLAIMER: The operator of this site (Vertical Financial Systems, Inc) are not registered investment advisers, broker/dealers, or research analysts/organizations. The content on this website is issued solely for information purposes and should not to be construed as an offer to buy, sell, or trade in any way, any security mentioned herein. All information presented on this website is believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. You are responsible for doing your own research before investing in any securities mentioned herein. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. Neither Vertical Financial Systems, Inc, nor its officers or employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of information on this website.
Full Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Powered by WordPress | theme SG Simple