The battle for the living room has been interesting to watch from an investing perspective. I have been down on Comcast for years, thinking their business model would be severely hampered by the cord cutters eliminating cable. This has been somewhat true as the stock price has been flattish over the last 5 years:

The one stock I have been kicking myself for not owning is Netflix – which has had an incredible run over the last 5 years:

Earlier this month, Netflix reported slowing growth, and the stock got hammered – down from 360’ish to 310’ish. Recent earnings showing a slowing of subscriber growth, and fears of the Disney streaming service and Apple streaming service spooked investors.

The way I see it – the market is wrong on this one. Granted Netflix’s valuation is awfully high, but even with their subscriber growth not meeting projections, it was still decent domestically and great internationally. Interestingly their growth in the previous year’s quarter also missed expectations, and it bounced back nicely the following quarter. The word on the street was that areas that had price increases fared the worst. I am willing to bet that subscribers to Netflix are not that price sensitive. Amazon raised the price on Amazon Prime and nobody blinked – I think Netflix has more levers they can pull to raise revenue if they feel the need.

Regarding the increase in competition – I think the market is overreacting on this one too. I agree Disney is going to be a formidable competitor (and luckily I have been long Disney for awhile), but I hardly think Netflix will be the one hurt the most by this. Netflix is an establishment in most households – and I think it has the strongest network effect of all streaming companies. I think the big losers will be the 2nd tier streaming/content services – things like CBS Interactive, maybe Showtime, HBO etc. If people want to cut down their expenses on monthly TV subscriptions, I think Netflix will be low on the list. Regarding Apple’s offering – I am willing to bet that it will be underwhelming and not meet expectations. I still am in the camp that Apple is struggling to execute on its new initiatives, so I think the market is overly concerned about this one.

I initiated a small position in Netflix a few months ago when I saw the stock price weaken on these competition concerns. I prefer to invest in companies with CEO’s that consistently make the right moves, and Reed Hastings meets that criteria. So even though I am underwater on my holdings of Netflix, I am definitely not selling, and considering doubling down on this one – I am just waiting for the stock market and price to stabilize then will take a closer look.

Every once in a while I get a notice of a bond offering from my broker for Ford Motor Credit. As I am always on the lookout for higher yields, I always pause and give this some thought.

With a 7 year CD yielding around 2.0%, my first thought is sure – Ford Motor seems pretty safe, maybe I should go after a higher yield. But after thinking about it a bit more, I always back off.

A couple problems keep creeping back in. First, I think the next market downturn will be initiated by some sort of credit breakdown, whether it be corporate borrowing, consumer borrowing, or sovereign borrowings – all at historically high levels. There is too much debt out there and so I am leery of low rated credit getting rated even lower. If this happens, I either want to be in high quality corporates, or government bonds. I am not sure I can consider Ford Motor a high quality corporation. The stock is lower now that it was 20 years ago, and has a terrible Debt/Free Cash Flow ratio of 6.77.

The second thought I have is the future of car manufacturers. The automobile industry is in the midst of a huge transformation and will likely look quite different in the next few years. From the switch to primarily gas fueled vehicles to electrics, to the concept of ride share replacing car ownership, I think the automobile business model will change drastically.

This disruption will lead to winners and losers. Will the ride share companies running autonomous vehicles be the winners? Will Tesla be the next big car manufacturer? All these questions nag at me as I look over the yield of these Ford Motor Credit bonds.

Investing in high yield bonds is always difficult. Every high yield bond/corporation has its fault, thus the risk premium. In many ways its similar to investing in stocks. It requires an investment thesis and opinion about the future. And for me, a low rated bond focused on consumer credit and the car industry looks like a risk that is too big to bear.

Townsquare Media is a company I have followed for a few years. I decided to post an article on Seeking Alpha about the company because I think it has an interesting story. The company primarily runs a number of rural radio stations, but is now working on tools to upsell its advertisers.

This stock has long been a value trap (and may still be), but if this new strategy pans out, it might be worth a look. For more details check out the article on Seeking Alpha.

Townsquare Media: Digital Solutions Could Be Catalyst For Growth

Note – Post updated on 4/27/19 – see below.

The other day I was looking over my portfolio to make changes based on what my valuation model suggested. One of the stocks in my top 10 holdings, Universal Forest Products, Inc (UFPI), came up as a stock to underweight based on relative valuation. UFPI is a pretty inexpensive, low growth stock, and it had a small run in the last few months.

As I often do with stocks in which I have a short term gain, I give some pause to selling. My model predicted a .44% increase in May, so its not like I was bearish on the stock, just thought there might be better alternatives in other securities. So I took a quick look to see if it might make sense to sell a covered call against my position, collect some extra income since I don’t think the stock is going to move much in May. So I pulled up the options chain, and saw an interesting tidbit:

It is interesting to see that the volume on most UFPI options is zero. This is a small 1.89 billion market cap stock, not followed by many people. But curiously, in this list of zero options, someone tossed down a 40 contract trade betting that the stock would go from its current price ($31) to over $35 by May 17th. Granted that is only a $400 investment (40 contracts @ $.10 * 100 shrs a contract), so this isn’t likely the so called ‘smart money’, but it is curious. UFPI releases earnings tomorrow (April 24th) after the bell – perhaps some small roller is ‘playing a hunch’ and trying to earn some extra cash.

At any rate, this raised my curiosity enough for me to hold onto my position until after the earnings release. I am not in any big hurry to sell, and maybe this is telegraphing some good news around the corner.

4/27/19 Update

Earnings came out more positive than expected, pushing the share price from around $30 to a $36.65 close on Friday. those options purchased for $0.10 are now worth approximately $1.90. That $400 option investment translates to a current value of $7,600. So it appears that if you are going to sell a stock, it may be worth always check the options trades to see if anybody might be making a big bet.

I have owned Boeing stock, but sold out of it last year due to a couple reasons. First, its a very large cap stock that grew a lot, and I didn’t understand why it jumped so much. My current opinion is on large cap stocks, you are competing more against institutional money that really models the company and the profits, so I don’t know if I want to try to outperform those companies with those resources.

The second reason I unloaded Boeing was more anecdotal. A group of guys I socialize with have and had worked for Boeing for the last 30 years. They were always very positive on Boeing and its management – until a few years ago. All of these employees were disgusted with management, and felt things were going downhill. I try to make a point in investing in superior management, and so this change in sentiment was enough to convince me to stay away.

With the recent drop in the price of Boeing stock due to the whole 737 Max events, I gave some thought to re-entering Boeing stock. The consensus had been that the problem is a software problem, easy enough to fix with software update. But more info is starting to come out, and now, I am beginning to think weak management is showing its hand.

This article on Quartz provides a great overview as to the issue surrounding the 737 Max. To summarize, when Airbus came out with a fuel efficient A320, Boeing had to quickly adapt the 737 to stay competitive. And to adapt the 737 to the new engines, they had to move the engines on the wing. This led to some handling problems, so they created software ‘as a kludge’ to offset the handling problem. So this is much more than just a software fix – the need for the software is due to a design flaw, which is additional complexity in the airplane. It seems this need to rush out a new plane for competitive needs may have led to deadly consequences. Also hitting the news is headlines about the approval process and the training provided to the airlines, none of it positive for Boeing.

So now, given this complexity and the headline risk, why would an airline pick the 737 Max over the A320? It seems this puts Boeing at a real competitive disadvantage. Indonesian airline Garunda already cancelled their orders for the Max – I would guess more will follow. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Boeing received no new orders for the 737 Max in March, and only 10 orders in the first quarter of 2019. Add on congressional investigations into the FAA certification process, the extended groundings, passenger perceptions of the airplane, and pilots concern related to the training, and I think the story gets worse before it gets better.

So if your bull thesis on Boeing is based on this 737 Max problem just being a software fix – think again. I think this could be the sign of cracks in the company culture and missteps by management. I think this plane that management forced out for competitive purposes could end up being a long term disaster for Boeing.

2019 has started out as an interesting year for the stock market. The year was set up with a disastrous December 2018, leading to some gloom and doom over the holidays. I recall telling friends in December (following the 5% Christmas Eve drop) that I thought there was a decent chance January would be positive, and if so, take that as a selling opportunity as the rest of the year will be crap.

I was right about January, as the market (as measured by the S&P 500) was up a solid 8%. Time to sell? Now… I am going to answer maybe not. In December the Federal Reserve was signalling 3 rate hikes, and there is an old Wall St saying – ‘don’t fight the Fed’. The saying refers to when the Fed is raising rates, be cautious. Now it turns out, in January the Fed has signaled that it may go more cautiously, presumably because the stock market threw a tantrum. Now there are predictions of a rate cut in 2019, even though the economy is presumably as strong as it has been in recent years.

In my opinion a rate cut may be economic malpractice – but even worse (from a fiscal responsibility perspective) there is now talk that the fed may slow quantitative tightening. This you may recall is the selling off of all the securities the government bought up during and after the 2008 market crash:

Of course we were told that when good times return, the government would sell off those securities and shrink down the balance sheet. And maybe it’s no coincidence that the stock market had a down year in the first year of quantitative tightening. But now there is talk of stopping this drawdown in 2019 or 2020, presumeably over concern that the economy is slowing too fast. The Federal Reserve now appears to be overly sensitive to the movements in the stock market, which for stock investors I guess is a good thing. This removes one big negative factor for the market I had going into 2019.

If the Fed has our back and is working to protect shareholders, I guess I am less negative than I was over the holidays. Other negative factors still exist, such as slowing growth in Europe, continued governmental dysfunction (i.e. the past and potential future shutdown), and Brexit. So I am still not calling for a great year, maybe just not as bad as I thought. I still think we have some major economic reckonings in the future, it’s just that the Fed is now willing to ‘run up the credit card’ to delay the economic downturn.